Wikipedia:Ij administrator/Archives

Add links
From Wikipedia

Administrator wono:

1 Belgian man

Comments: Maybe not permanent, but the problem is that now nobody else can make users to an admin if they are a candidate-Admin with more votes for than votes against. I know if there is no bureaucrat a steward have to make admins, but we have no stewards. If I am voted for, I'll contact Angela.

IMPORTANT NOTE: For the moment I am not an admin anymore because nl:Gebruiker:Andre Engels thought it was an adminship for a short period. I've asked the permanent adminship to him and I think I'll got it back. So I let stand my candidateship for bureaucrat here. - Belgian man 22:08, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

For
  1. Obvious candidate (as I have said on at least two other pages). Robin Patterson 21:14, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Against
  1. -

1 CdaMVvWgS

Start of voting: 11 February 2005 | End of voting: 11 March 2005
Comments: I would also like to be an admin, because I'm currently learning Nauruan by myself with a grammar. And I think that Belgian man and me, we would be a very good team to coordinate and to build up a good Wikipedia in Nauruan language. (This my candidature is also for the Nauruan Wiktionary, where I'm also active and where I would also like to be an admin. Thanks.)

Ian obwen

  1. Belgian man - will be a very good admin, I hope he is voted for at the end of voting (please see this and give your idea)
  2. Jon Harald Søby (talk, contrib) – I'm positive CdaMVvWgS will make a very good admin, he has proven to be a good resource for the Nauruan Wikipedia.

Ekowong

1 Belgian man (bureaucrat)

Start of voting: 3 December 2004 | End of voting: 12 February 2005
Comments: Maybe not permanent, but the problem is that now nobody else can make users to an admin if they are a candidate-Admin with more votes for than votes against. I know if there is no bureaucrat a steward have to make admins, but we have no stewards. If I am voted for, I'll contact Angela.

Ian obwen

  1. Obvious candidate (as I have said on at least two other pages). Robin Patterson 21:14, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  2. -- CdaMVvWgS 11:25, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ekowong


Belgian man is now a bureaucrat here. Angela 01:42, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

1 Jon Harald Søby

Start of voting: 17 June 2005 | End of voting: 17 July 2005
Comments: I would like to be an admin here as I am quite active (second most active according to [1] (which also for some reason classifies me as "inactive"…?)), and being admin would be a handy feature, in means of fighting vandalism, being able to edit articles in the MediaWiki namespace and so on. Jon Harald Søby (talk, contrib) 15:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ian obwen

  1. Belgian man 08:15, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  2. Artur Lion 17:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ekowong

Node ue

Start of voting: 11 August 2005 | End of voting: 11 September 2005
Comments: Currently, many people are worried about the Nauruan Wikipedia -- Wouter Steenbeek referred to the "Nauruan debâcle" (Belgian man being the defacto leader here despite his low knowledge of Nauruan, and creating poor-quality substub pages), Walter V. expressed concerns to me privately along the same lines as Wouter, GerardM expressed them before, and others have expressed them in various other places as well. This includes me. Although milestones are celebrated, and new pages are created, it is going slowly downhill. Belgian man has been using a template for u with a tilde sometimes, despite the fact that it is available in the "Copyright warning" box. I consider myself a level of na-1. Like Belgian man, I am comfortable writing text in Nauruan -- with a dictionary on hand. I am already an administrator at the Navajo Wikipedia (nv.wiki), where I am responsible for all modifications to the Mediawiki namespace and reversions of vandalism. I think I have proven my record. I think I can be useful in some ways: reversion of vandalism, general cleanup, and hopefully eventually in finding real Nauruans for this Wikipedia. --Node ue 07:45, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ian obwen

  1. Jon Harald Søby (talk, contrib) 15:47, 11 August 2005 (UTC) One note: The characters in the copyright warning box were added by me about a week ago or so, so they're fairly new.[reply]
  2. Belgian man
    1. Although:
      1. You handle me like I'm a vandal and you try to reveal that I would be a crazy vandal, although I was the one who reset this wikipedia after a wave of vandalism and non-Nauruan substubs.
      2. I do not realize the wrongness of stubs, and I am only creating "stubs" who are only on the English wiki recognized as stubs (no article about a Polish place is written by me); on the Dutch wiki, by example, they would be recognized as passable! The English wiki is too demanding, and categorises 3/4 of his articles as stubs.
      3. Maybe you doubt this, but it is true: There are yet three admins (inclusive me) who reverse each form of vandalism within a day. I know it is better that there are four admins who can do this, but I only say this just.
      4. You are here only for ONE day.
    2. Because:
      1. If you can find a real Nauruan, that would be a great prestation.
      2. Many contacts on Meta.
    3. Notes:
      1. I do not choose for an available option "Neutral" or "Blanco" on votings on this wikipedia. Otherwise, I would vote for such an option.
      2. I hope you'll slowly stop thinking that I'm a crackers vandal.
      3. It was thanks to GerardM that I standed for the adminship. He got in touch with me on the Dutch wiktionary, after the wave of vandalism.
      4. I asked Steinbach on nl: to his problems with this edition.
        1. Steinbach said a few days ago on my talkpage on nl: that he knows that it goes better now with the Nauruan Language Edition.

Ekowong

Meibitobure

Start of voting: 15 September 2005 | End of voting: 15 October 2005
Comments: I want to propose him because he is currently the only user here who speaks the Nauruan language fluently. Although he doesn't have the required fifty contributions, I propose him and vote for him, because he then could edit the wiki messages on Special:Allmessages; a temporal adminship is also a possibility. -- CdaMVvWgS 12:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ian obwen

  1. CdaMVvWgS
  2. Artur Lion
  3. Node ue 04:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. / Jon Harald Søby 07:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ekowong

  1. Belgian man
    1. Meibitobure HAS NOT 50 contributions, he hasn't a user page... And it is absolutely not usual that other users propose somebody for the adminship. Conclusion: I must delete this whole propose (these three things are rather heavy), I am not allowed to vote Ian obwen or Ekowong, (neither is CdaMVvWgS, Artur or someone else) but I must cancel this propose. But Meibitobure is a VERY IMPORTANT USER, he is the most important user ever here on the Nauruan Wikipedia Edition. Why? Because he is the only mother-tongue Nauruan here. Thus, this is the FIRST AND THE LAST time that I do not keep to the rules: Instead of cancel this whole caprice... I only vote Ekowong... on principle! STAY, Meibitobure, you are a brilliant person! I have nothing "contra" you. But... I wish to vote here "Ekowong" on principle. I hope you'll understand my decision! Ekamawir omo and keep on the good work, Belgian man 18:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC) PS: If you let me know (on my talk page) that it is no problem that CdaMVvWgS proposed you as admin, if you have 60 contributions and if you have a userpage, I'll replace my vote to "Ian obwen" :-)[reply]
    • It's nice to follow rules, but they do not have to be followed strictly. Meiboture is a quick learner, it seems, and having the only mothertongue Nauruan as an admin has no disadvantages, rather only advantages (that I can see). / Jon Harald Søby 07:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

7elteven

Ekomowir omo! There is no any active administrators in Nauruan Wikipedia, so I can be one. I'm learning Nauruan language for about 1 year and I've been active here since November 2020. — 7elteven (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh:

Eh: I know that User:7elteven won't abuse these tools. SHB2000 (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC) - I'm changing this to a no as he's block on lt.wikipedia. SHB2000 (talk) 07:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deo:

eredu:

Can you explain your block? Seems like it was a sockpuppetry case? Leaderboard (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SHB2000

Ekomowir omo! Sorry for speaking english here. There's no active admin here, and this project is highly likely to a target spot for w:en:WP:LTA/GRP who commonly tends to attack me, cross wiki. I've also been learning Nauruan since the start of this year, and I'm the most active user on this wiki and have significantly improved some articles like Sydney SHB2000 (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh:

Eh: as nominator SHB2000 (talk) 08:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK because it's likely to be temporary. Leaderboard (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Would be surprised if it were over 6 months at this stage. SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deo:

erudu

SHB2000 (renewal one)

Ekamowir Omo! My admin rights are ending soon, so I'm having to start this discussion to renew this. The main reason is so I can block w:en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jurisdrew, but to also do some other janitorial things as well. SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh (Support)

Deo (Oppose)

Eredu (notes)

Outcome: Renewed. SHB2000 (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

7elteven (renewal one)

Ekamawir omo again. After ending of my adminship, the only active admin (and in general a participant) was SHB2000. I didn't have any time because of exams. As soon as the time came, I decided to become an admin again and help SHB2000 to revive the Nauruan Wikipedia. – 7elteven (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh (Support)

Deo (Oppose)

Well, that was my past mistakes that I made more that a year ago on ltwikipedia. I don't make it anymore. Btw, this account was not my sock on Wikipedia, just the new account so I don't really know why admins blocked this account. - 7elteven (talk)
I didn't do any contributions there so I can't be the sock puppet. -7elteven (talk) 04:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:FlowMention Stewards may need to check your deleted contributions before you can say "I never edited here/on Lithuanian wikis": both here and on ltwiki. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:FlowMention you can check it here without any stewards. -7elteven (talk) 09:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:FlowMention That tool won't provide enough informations on deleted contributions due to the potential Oversight actions, to which you have to wait for Stewards' judges. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eredu (notes)

Why are you blocked at Incubator? Leaderboard (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Leaderboard. I was creating Kamassian Wikipedia, however, user MF-Warburg thought I don't know the language and that this Wiki was on fake Kamassian. That's not true. I know this language well and I am a member of the Kamassian language group on Facebook. User Valtteri Lahti was also blocked for this reason. Btw, he posted the new in his Facebook group where he said that I was blocked [2]. "They claimed it was just Russian with Kamassian words, which simply isn’t true." he said. But Ukrainian, Belarussian and more languages also have some Russian words so it doesn't mean anything. – 7elteven (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:7elteven, I don't see any unblock discussion with MF-Warburg, so can you clarify there? Leaderboard (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to ask him for unblock, so yes, I can clarify there. -7elteven (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done that. -7elteven (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. That would be a really long story, but I will try to explain. About 3 years ago I started contributing. Only then I did very bad, short articles with grammar mistakes and I was blocked because of it (they blocked the account which is called Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki. Then I was making a sock puppets until the summer of 2020. Then I realized my mistake. I don't make any sock puppets there. This account was blocked because the ip of this account and the ip of the account on which I made socks are the same. But how I said, I didn't do any contributions there so I simply can't be the sock puppet. -7elteven (talk) 04:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense and glad you learned from your mistake. SHB2000 (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don’t want to outright oppose because this user seems to be editing in good faith despite some previous issues on other wikis. However, given the above concerns it may be wise to give the contributor some more time before promoting to admin. Maybe rights such as patrolling could be given to the user first to regain trustworthiness? SelfieCity (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly there's no patroller or rollbacker right here. There's only "none", "IP block exempt" and "administrator". SHB2000 (talk) 09:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was administrator on nawiki for 3 months and didn't abuse any tools. -7elteven (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome: Rejected by stewards. SHB2000 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://na.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Ij_administrator/Archives&oldid=89056"