User talk:Node ue

Template:Talofa Belgian man 15:35, 11 August 2005 (UTC) (although you think I'm a vandal)[reply]

Stub

Node ue, I know that on the English wiki, it is normal to put a {stub}-template on an article of fifty lines and two images... But here, on na:, I use the usage of the Dutch edition: If there are 3 facts or more in the article, it isn't a stub. Otherwise, it is too demanding. Belgian man 15:42, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nauruan word list

Hi there,
do you have a link to the website which contains your word list? Thank you very much. Ekamawir Omo -- CdaMVvWgS 15:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

You are an admin now, congratulations. Belgian man 09:56, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Warning(s?)

1st warning: Deleting Sopot and Ełk (without nominating them). Belgian man 11:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moderatorsmentaliteit?

Ik heb liever dat je artikelen eerst nomineert. En dat je als moderator iets meer actief bent. En wil je ook van de landenartikelen blijven, Node (op verzoek van CdaMVvWgS). Ik heb het maar eens in het Nederlands gedaan omdat je volgens dit toch Nederlands verstaat... Je mag antwoorden in het Engels. Belgian man 11:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wiki.png

Hi. I reverted the new logo to the last version; with invisible background, the logo looks destroyed in Internet Explorer (in my defense, I don't use IE normally, but I'm at school now, so I have no other option). I'll upload a logo with the new text asap. To fix the error I'm talking about, some developer must change the URL of the logo in a CSS file unaccessable to normal editors... / Jon Harald Søby 07:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It also looked destroyed on my IE. Belgian man 16:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My internet explorer also showed a pretty weard logo. Geograaf a.k.a. Netherlands girl 18:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My IE showed it fine. Not sure what's going on with that. --Node ue 01:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your admin status

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on nawiki, where you are an administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.

If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.

We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Best regards, Rs chen 7754 04:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]